AnaChart vs Simply Wall St: Fundamental Value vs Analyst Accuracy (2026)

Last updated: July 3, 2026

What Simply Wall St does well

Simply Wall St is one of the most approachable fundamental-analysis tools out there. Its signature is the “Snowflake” — a five-point graphic scoring a stock on value, future growth, past performance, financial health, and dividends — backed by a discounted-cash-flow (DCF) fair-value estimate and relative-valuation ratios. It even lets you toggle between its DCF fair value, the analyst price-target consensus, or your own number.

For visualizing whether a company looks cheap or expensive on fundamentals, it’s genuinely useful, and it’s cheap (around $10–11/month billed annually, with a free tier and a 7-day trial).

Here’s the boundary, though: Simply Wall St shows you the analyst price-target consensus as one input, but it doesn’t tell you which of those analysts has actually met their targets on the stock. That’s the gap AnaChart fills.

What AnaChart measures differently

AnaChart scores each sell-side analyst per stock. Every price target since 2004 is checked against what the stock actually did, producing a per-analyst, per-stock record — a met ratio (how often their targets were reached), how long their calls took, and, most importantly, a performance score that determines the ranking.

Where Simply Wall St hands you a fundamental fair value for the company, AnaChart tells you, for this exact name, which analyst behind those targets has earned your trust — and the answer is rarely the one with the prettiest headline number.

How AnaChart ranks analysts: the performance score

The method matters here. AnaChart does not rank analysts by hit rate. It ranks them by a performance score that rewards hitting targets big and fast — it weights the size of a correct call (conviction) and the speed with which the stock reached the target, and it scores a missed target as zero. An analyst’s score on a stock is the average across all their targets on that name.

Why does that matter? Because a target that’s “eventually right” after 14 months is worth far less than a bold call that paid off in three. Tesla shows exactly how that plays out.

A real Tesla example: a 65% hit rate beats an 89% one

Tesla is one of the most argued-over stocks on the market, so it’s a good test. Here are four of its well-covered analysts, ranked by AnaChart’s performance score — with each analyst’s rank by hit rate on the left, and by performance score on the right:

Look at the top two. Itay Michaeli hits only 65% of his Tesla targets — yet ranks #1, ahead of Vijay Rakesh, who hits a far higher 89%. The reason is speed and conviction: Michaeli’s correct calls land in about 86 days versus 274 for Rakesh, and both carry real samples (55 and 36 targets). A fundamental fair value wouldn’t weigh in on either analyst; a hit-rate screen would pick Rakesh; only a per-analyst performance score surfaces that the faster, bolder analyst has been the more useful one to follow on Tesla.

Fundamental fair value vs per-analyst accuracy

The core difference in one line: Simply Wall St values the company; AnaChart grades the analysts on the company.

The Snowflake and DCF answer “does this stock look cheap or expensive on its fundamentals?” — a useful starting point. But Simply Wall St also shows you the analyst price-target consensus, and that’s where AnaChart picks up: it tells you which of those analysts has actually met their targets on the stock, so you know how much weight a given target deserves. The two layers stack neatly.

Simply Wall St vs AnaChart, side by side

Simply Wall St details verified against simplywall.st as of June 2026; confirm current pricing on their site.

What AnaChart doesn’t replace

To be clear, AnaChart isn’t a fundamentals tool. It doesn’t run a DCF, draw a Snowflake, score financial health or dividends, or track a portfolio, and it focuses on US-listed names. If you want a fast read on whether a company looks cheap or expensive on its fundamentals, Simply Wall St does that well and cheaply.

The clean division of labor: use Simply Wall St to gauge fundamental value and build the watchlist; use AnaChart when the decision comes down to a specific analyst’s target on a specific stock — to know whether the person behind it has actually met their targets, ranked by how big and fast their correct calls were.

Pricing and how to choose

Simply Wall St: a free tier, with Premium around $10–11/month (billed annually) and a 7-day trial. AnaChart: a free Basic tier (sample stocks without registration, the Nasdaq 100 with a free account); Advanced is $45/month with a 7-day free trial, unlocking all 5,600+ US-listed stocks, per-stock performance scores, multi-analyst comparison, and alerts.

The fastest way to feel the difference is free: pick a stock you own and look at who has actually met their targets on it — Tesla’s analyst records and performance scores are open right now, no sign-up required, or browse the top performing analysts by sector. Institutions can license the full dataset warehouse-native through Corporate Access on Snowflake or Google BigQuery.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is AnaChart a good Simply Wall St alternative?

For the specific job of judging analyst accuracy, yes — and it’s more precise, because it scores analysts per stock instead of showing a single consensus, and it’s free to start. But the two are more complementary than competitive: Simply Wall St handles fundamental valuation (DCF, the Snowflake, financial health), while AnaChart tells you which analyst behind the price targets has actually met their targets. Many investors use both.

How is AnaChart different from Simply Wall St’s fair value?

Simply Wall St’s fair value is a fundamental estimate (mostly DCF) of what the company is worth. AnaChart doesn’t value the company — it grades the analysts on the stock, checking every price target since 2004 against what the stock did and ranking them by a performance score. So Simply Wall St answers “is it cheap?” and AnaChart answers “which analyst has met their targets?”

How does AnaChart rank analysts — is it just hit rate?

No. AnaChart ranks by a performance score that rewards hitting targets big and fast: it weights the size of a correct call and the speed it landed, and scores misses as zero. That’s why, on Tesla, TD Cowen’s Itay Michaeli ranks #1 with just a 65% hit rate — his correct calls land in ~86 days — ahead of an analyst hitting 89% whose targets take 274 days.

Does Simply Wall St show analyst accuracy?

It shows the analyst price-target consensus as one of its fair-value reference points, but it doesn’t score individual analysts on whether their targets came true. For that — which analyst to actually trust on a given stock — you need a per-analyst, per-stock accuracy record, which is what AnaChart provides.

Does AnaChart score analysts per stock?

Yes — that’s its core difference from a single consensus number. The same analyst can have a strong record on one stock and a weak one on another, and AnaChart shows both per stock rather than blending them.

How much does Simply Wall St cost vs AnaChart?

Simply Wall St has a free tier with Premium around $10–11/month billed annually (7-day trial). AnaChart has a free Basic tier, and Advanced is $45/month with a 7-day free trial covering all 5,600+ US-listed stocks plus performance scores, multi-analyst charts, and alerts.

Should I use Simply Wall St and AnaChart together?

Many investors do. Simply Wall St gives you the fundamental valuation picture and a watchlist; AnaChart tells you which of the analysts covering a stock has actually met their targets on it and ranks them by performance. Together you get the valuation view and the per-stock analyst precision.

Related on AnaChart: see Tesla analyst price targets & accuracy, browse the top performing analysts by sector, and compare platforms in AnaChart vs Zacks, TipRanks vs AnaChart, and vs GuruFocus.

For institutional teams: AnaChart’s full analyst price-target and accuracy dataset — every analyst, every target and revision since 2004 — is available warehouse-native through AnaChart Corporate Access, delivered straight into Snowflake or Google BigQuery with no ETL.