Stock Target Advisor Alternatives in 2026 (It Retired Its Analysis Tool — Here's Where to Go)

Last updated: July 3, 2026

What happened to Stock Target Advisor?

If Stock Target Advisor stopped working the way it used to, you read it right. In June 2025 the company retired its automated stock-analysis service, citing difficult market conditions and the flood of free AI research tools.

Here are the specifics that matter. Per its own transition notice, existing paid subscriptions were cancelled as of June 15, 2025 and refunded in full within 15 days, with no action required from subscribers. The site re-launched as a free blog and newsletter, with a new “AI plus human” platform described only as “coming soon.”

Bottom line: the brand still exists, but the capability — the on-demand analyst-accuracy grades, consensus targets, and buy/sell screens you actually opened the site for — is gone. That’s the gap you’re replacing, and it’s worth replacing deliberately.

What made Stock Target Advisor worth using

Name the thing it did well before you replace it, because most stock sites don’t do it. Stock Target Advisor’s premise was rare and correct: not every analyst is equal, and a price target is only worth as much as the record behind it.

So instead of showing every Wall Street rating with equal weight, it graded analysts by their historical accuracy — and here’s the key detail — it graded that accuracy by sector. An analyst earned, in effect, one accuracy reputation for “technology” or “energy,” applied across every stock in that sector. It paired this with a buy/sell/hold verdict across thousands of US and Canadian stocks, on a free tier that ran about $7/month for premium.

That sector-level accuracy lens is the capability to protect when you switch. As the rest of this guide shows, one alternative reproduces it more precisely than Stock Target Advisor ever did — and a few others cover the jobs around it.

The best Stock Target Advisor alternatives in 2026, by use case

There is no single drop-in clone, and any list that pretends otherwise is glossing over the fact that Stock Target Advisor quietly did three jobs at once: analyst-accuracy grading, a buy/sell verdict, and broad screening. Pick your replacement by the job you actually used it for.

A quick read on the ones that matter most for STA’s core job. AnaChart is the most direct heir, because it’s built around the same question — has this analyst actually met their targets? — and answers it more precisely (the method is below). MarketBeat is the nearest in spirit if you liked the “accuracy score plus alerts” combination, though its scores are global per contributor rather than per stock. TipRanks is closest to STA’s “one number per stock” convenience, but it folds bloggers and sentiment into the score and gates the deep history. For the reason people specifically chose Stock Target Advisor — weighting analysts by whether they’ve met their targets — AnaChart is the natural successor, so the rest of this guide goes deep there.

Why AnaChart is the closest replacement for the accuracy use case

AnaChart starts from the exact principle Stock Target Advisor did — judge analysts by their track record — and applies it one stock at a time instead of one sector at a time. For every US-listed stock, it takes each analyst covering the name, looks at every price target they’ve issued, and checks it against what the stock actually did.

The result is a per-analyst, per-stock record made of three numbers you can read at a glance:

• Met ratio — of all the targets this analyst set on this stock, how many were actually reached. The clean answer to “when this person puts a number on this name, does it come true?”
• Performance score — goes beyond hit-rate to reward the size and speed of correct calls. A bold target reached quickly counts for more than a timid one that crept into range; a miss counts for nothing.
• Rating held since — the date the analyst’s current rating began, so you can tell fresh conviction from a stale call.

The difference in one line: Stock Target Advisor told you an analyst was accurate in their sector; AnaChart tells you whether they’ve been accurate on the exact name in front of you. As the example below shows, that’s frequently a different answer.

How AnaChart measures analyst accuracy (in plain English)

It’s fair to ask of any tool that grades analysts: how is the grade computed, and can you trust it? AnaChart’s answer is deliberately easy to verify.

It keeps a record of every analyst price target on US-listed stocks going back to 2004 — each one a number and a date. To score a target, it checks the market: did the stock actually trade to that level within the relevant window? Targets reached count as hits; targets that weren’t count as misses. Nothing is graded on opinion or reputation.

Two things make this more useful than a raw hit-rate. First, it’s computed per stock, so the same analyst can carry a 90% record on one name and a 50% record on another — and you see both, not a blended average. Second, the performance score weights conviction and timing, so a high score flags analysts who made big, early, correct calls rather than those who hugged the consensus and were technically “not wrong.”

Here’s why that matters for trust: because every input is a public price target checked against public price history, the grade is auditable — click any analyst and see the individual targets behind their record, plotted over time against the stock. It’s the same “accuracy over reputation” idea Stock Target Advisor stood for, with the math shown rather than summarized into one sector letter-grade.

Per-stock vs by-sector: a real example

This is where the difference stops being abstract. Take Salesforce (CRM).

A prominent technology analyst such as Wedbush’s Daniel Ives carries a strong sector reputation, and a by-sector grade — the Stock Target Advisor model — reflects that. On a sector view, he looks like a name to follow on any large tech stock.

Now zoom into Salesforce specifically, and the picture inverts. Ives’s price targets on CRM have been met just 17 of 26 times (about 65%) — among the weakest active records on the stock — while Barclays’ Raimo Lenschow sits at 41 of 48 (about 85%) on the very same name.

Both are credentialed technology analysts, so a single “tech accuracy” grade would lump them together. Only a per-stock record tells you that, on this one position, Lenschow’s targets have been far more reliable. That’s the difference between following the 85% analyst and the 65% one — and it’s invisible to a sector grade. Multiply it across every stock you hold, and the value of per-stock precision compounds.

One nuance worth making explicit: AnaChart doesn’t rank analysts by hit rate — it ranks them by a performance score that also weights how big and how fast their correct calls were. On Salesforce the two happen to line up (Lenschow leads on score too, 2.66 to Ives’s 1.12), but they don’t always: on some stocks the highest-scoring analyst isn’t the one with the best hit rate at all, because one bold, fast, correct call outweighs a run of timid ones. The met ratio is the simple version; the performance score is what decides the ranking.

Stock Target Advisor vs AnaChart, side by side

Stock Target Advisor status verified at stocktargetadvisor.com on June 17, 2026.

What AnaChart does not replace

Being straight about the gaps is the point of a comparison worth reading — and it’s what the thin directory pages ranking for this term won’t tell you.

AnaChart is focused on US-listed analyst accuracy, and that focus has edges. It’s not a one-click buy/sell verdict engine — by design, it shows the evidence and leaves the decision to you, which is more work than a green “Buy” badge. It doesn’t cover Canadian tickers, so if a chunk of your watchlist trades in Toronto, you’ll need another source for those names. And it’s not a broad fundamentals-and-screening suite — you won’t run a 20-criteria stock screen inside it.

The practical move: if those were central to how you used STA, pair AnaChart with a general tool such as StockAnalysis.com — the general tool for fundamentals and screening, AnaChart for the analyst-accuracy layer on top. For the one capability that made Stock Target Advisor distinctive, AnaChart is the more precise successor, not a watered-down stand-in.

How to switch in a few minutes

You don’t need to commit anything — or even create an account — to test whether AnaChart fits how you used Stock Target Advisor. Here’s the fastest path to a real answer:

1. Pick a stock you actually own and open its analyst page — for example, Salesforce (CRM). The track records are visible immediately, no sign-up required.
2. Read the records, not the ratings. Look at each analyst’s met ratio and performance score, and notice how two analysts with the same “Buy” can have very different histories on the name — that spread is exactly what you’re paying attention to now.
3. Find the most and least reliable analyst on the stock, and check the “rating held since” date to separate fresh conviction from a stale call.
4. Rebuild your old sector view by browsing the top performing analysts by sector — then drill into any name for the per-stock detail Stock Target Advisor couldn’t show.

Pricing: free vs Advanced, and when to upgrade

Start free. AnaChart’s Basic tier costs nothing — check a curated set of sample stocks with no account, and unlock the full Nasdaq 100 with a free account. For anyone focused on large-cap US names, that alone replaces the accuracy-checking workflow.

Where free stops is breadth and depth: it doesn’t reach the long tail of small- and mid-caps, the full performance score, multi-analyst chart overlays, or alerts. Those sit in Advanced, $45/month with a 7-day free trial, which opens all 5,600+ US-listed stocks, per-stock performance scores, multi-analyst comparison, and alerting when an analyst you follow revises a target.

A simple rule for deciding: run the free tier on the large-caps you already hold for a week; the moment you want the same lens on a name outside the Nasdaq 100, the trial costs nothing to test. Institutions that need the whole dataset can license it warehouse-native through AnaChart Corporate Access on Snowflake or Google BigQuery, with no ETL.

Frequently Asked Questions

Did Stock Target Advisor shut down?

Effectively, yes — the tool people used did. Stock Target Advisor retired its automated stock-analysis service on June 15, 2025, citing market conditions and the rise of free AI tools. Per its own notice, existing paid subscriptions were cancelled and fully refunded within 15 days with no action required, and the site became a free blog and newsletter, with a new platform “coming soon.” The company name still exists, but the on-demand analyst-accuracy ratings, consensus targets, and buy/sell screens are no longer a live product — which is the part that sends people looking for an alternative.

What is the best Stock Target Advisor alternative?

It depends on which of its three jobs you used it for. For grading analysts by track record — its signature feature — AnaChart is the closest and more precise replacement, because it scores analysts per stock rather than by sector. For consensus plus per-analyst accuracy scores, MarketBeat and TipRanks are the nearest. For fundamentals, forecasts and screening, StockAnalysis.com covers more ground including ETFs and international names. Many former users keep AnaChart for the analyst layer and a general tool alongside it for the data tables.

Is there a free Stock Target Advisor alternative?

Yes — you can replace most of what you used Stock Target Advisor for without paying anything. AnaChart’s free Basic tier lets you check sample stocks with no account, and unlocks the full Nasdaq 100 once you create a free account. On any of those names you get the core workflow STA was used for: every analyst covering the stock, each one’s met ratio (how often their targets came true), and how their records compare. (Pineify also offers a free, no-registration ratings lookup if you just want a quick check.) AnaChart’s free tier is genuinely useful for large-cap US investors; where it stops — smaller stocks, the conviction-weighted score, multi-analyst overlays, and alerts — lives in Advanced ($45/month, with a 7-day free trial). A good test: run the free tier on the large-caps you hold for a week, and only reach for the trial if you want the same lens on names outside the Nasdaq 100.

How does AnaChart measure analyst accuracy, and can I trust the numbers?

Every score traces back to public data you could check yourself. AnaChart keeps each analyst price target since 2004 — a number and a date — and grades it against what the stock actually did: targets reached count as hits, ones that weren’t count as misses. From that it computes a met ratio (hit rate on the stock) and a performance score that also rewards the size and speed of correct calls. Nothing is based on reputation, and you can click into any analyst to see the individual targets behind their record plotted over time. That auditability is the point — it’s the same “accuracy over reputation” idea Stock Target Advisor stood for, with the math shown.

How accurate are Wall Street analyst price targets, generally?

Far less uniformly accurate than their prominence suggests — which is exactly why per-analyst, per-stock records are useful. On a single stock, two analysts with the same rating can sit far apart: on Salesforce, one covering analyst has hit about 85% of his targets while another has hit about 65%.

The lesson isn’t that analysts are useless; it’s that you should weight them by their record on the specific name — the job a tool like AnaChart exists to do.

Does AnaChart grade analysts the way Stock Target Advisor did?

Same principle, sharper lens. Stock Target Advisor graded accuracy by sector — one reputation per analyst per industry. AnaChart grades it per stock, checking every price target since 2004 against the market. The Salesforce example is the proof: two credentialed tech analysts, same “Buy,” yet an 85% record versus a 65% one on that one name — a distinction a single sector grade blends away.

Can I track a specific analyst across the stocks they cover?

Yes. Beyond looking up a stock and seeing its analysts, you can follow an individual analyst and see their record across every name they cover, including how each current rating has performed and when it began. That’s useful when a particular analyst’s call moves a stock you own and you want to know, quickly, whether their history justifies the attention.

How does AnaChart compare with TipRanks and MarketBeat?

All three move past raw consensus, but they answer slightly different questions. TipRanks blends analysts and financial bloggers into a composite “Smart Score” and gates much of the history; MarketBeat publishes accuracy scores per contributor and is strong on timely upgrade/downgrade alerts. AnaChart’s distinction is granularity: it scores accuracy per stock rather than as a single global figure, and shows the full price-target history behind each score. If you want a quick blended number, TipRanks or MarketBeat are fine; if you want to know whether a specific analyst has met their targets on a specific stock, AnaChart is built for that. (See AnaChart vs TipRanks and AnaChart vs MarketBeat.)

What about Stock Target Advisor’s buy/sell verdict and Canadian coverage?

AnaChart deliberately doesn’t hand you a buy/sell verdict — it shows which analysts have earned credibility on a stock and lets you make the call, which is more transparent but more work than a one-word badge. It also focuses on US-listed names, so it doesn’t cover Canadian tickers. If verdicts, screening, or Canadian coverage were core to your use, pair AnaChart with a general research platform for those; for analyst accuracy specifically, AnaChart is the focused successor.

Will my Stock Target Advisor subscription be refunded?

Per the company’s own notice, subscriptions were cancelled as of June 15, 2025 with full refunds issued within 15 days, and no action was required from subscribers. If you don’t see a refund or have a billing question, contact Stock Target Advisor directly — AnaChart isn’t affiliated with them and can’t process their refunds.

Related on AnaChart: AnaChart vs Simply Wall St is also worth a look. see Salesforce analyst price targets & accuracy, browse the top performing analysts by sector, and compare platforms in AnaChart vs TipRanks, vs MarketBeat, and vs WallStreetZen.

For institutional teams: AnaChart’s full analyst price-target and accuracy dataset — every analyst, every target and revision since 2004 — is available warehouse-native through AnaChart Corporate Access, delivered straight into Snowflake or Google BigQuery with no ETL.